каталог бесплатных wap сайтов бесплатно скачать





” The expression means that all the great “representation” doesn’t necessarily mean lower taxes. 2009 · By 1765 the term "no taxation without representation" was in use in Boston, but no one is sure who first used it. Not only working, but owning a very successful business. Britain disagreed. I thought it would be interesting to take a trip to "make believe" land. "Taxation without representation is tyranny” was a slogan of the American Revolution. Boston politician James Otis was most famously associated with the term, "taxation without representation is tyranny. What if we were to say that any American citizen not allowed to vote in American elections did not have to pay taxes. James Otis said "Taxation without representation is tyranny". 2016 · Then to tax the people in order to support the tyranny of the Federal Gruberment is nothing short of criminal. 06. Taxation without representation and without benefits is tyranny! America’s founders refused to accept it, why would their descendants be any different. 1765 . In that trip, I am still working. Consider this form of taxation without representation and criminal skullduggery all rolled into one. One, we are forced into the Social Security Ponzi scam that NONE OF US VOTED FOR. Two, we have our money, get that, OUR MONEY, seized Excerpts: “Those who advocate woman suffrage are fond of quoting the colonial dictum that taxation without representation is tyranny, and declare that this, one of ‘the fundamental principles upon which the country was founded,’ is shamefully violated under present circumstances as far as women are concerned. 04. " Almost no colonist wanted to be independent of Taxation without Representation "Taxation without representation is tyranny" James Otis. TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION: A colonial leader named James Otis said that parliament didn't have a right to tax the Colonists without a say. I employ people, make a good product, and invest the profits of the company wisely. 13. 01. “Any one who has examined the ‘argument’ critically, and realizes what a . Parliament couldn't do this because he was not their representative. A modern version of the saying is: “If Patrick Henry thought taxation without representation was bad, he should see it today with representation. "[1]Flag as InappropriateAmerican expats today, like the American colonialists of the 18th century are no longer accepting the terms and conditions being forced upon them from an Imperial capital thousands of miles away. After all that was one of the main ignitors of the Revolutionary WarHistory experts say the main reason the colonists were angry was because Britain had rejected the idea of "no taxation without representation

Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.
E-Mail: admin@aimi.ru